Organizations of all types have struggled to come to grips with terms like Government 2.0, Social Business, Social Media, and a long list of others that are floating around book stores, universities, and blogs.
I have spent a lot of time speaking with businesses and government agencies, exploring what is working, what is failing, and seeking to understand where confusion and hype are preventing these organizations from achieving full value from their efforts. The Social Ecosystem is the result of these efforts and is meant to reduce confusion and offer guidance for organizations across the world.
Lofty goals? Perhaps, but the Social Ecosystem is not being defined in a vacuum, it will fully leverage many ideas that are already available and will evolve, as needed, as we continue to learn more.
For this post I will discuss, at a high level, the major components of the Social Ecosystem as well as some key definitions. Over time I plan to create a table of contents, a section for terms, and break this down into a book-like format. Please be patient as it will take time and we’ll all work through this together.
Key Components
- The Social Ecosystem. The Social Ecosystem provides a structure within which all types of organizations live and interact. This ecosystem is open and inclusive of both public and private organizations and remains independent of geography and language.
- The Social Organization. Organizations ranging from small and medium businesses to enterprises to local and federal governments (and so on) are all social organizations.
- I will begin by looking at the key behaviors and requirements from an Ecosystem perspective.
- As we continue we will explore the internals of the Social Organization. I will add in concepts like Social CRM, Enterprise 2.0, and Government 2.0. There will be no attempt to replace these concepts, instead, they will be included as they fit very well within this model.
- In the long-term the Social Organization should be thought of as a standard, including various levels of compliance that address security, training, measurement, level of channel neutrality, and more.
- The Social Unit. The smallest part of the Ecosystem includes teams and individuals. We will discuss concepts like social currency, the social value cycle (compliments of Paul Doyle, CEO of Proofspace), leadership and organizational structures.
The Social Ecosystem is channel-neutral (thanks Steve Schildwachter) and does not promote any specific tools or vendors. It will stay open and independent.
Key Definitions
These are a starting point and we will certainly add to these as we move forward.
- Social CRM. My definition builds off of Paul Greenberg’s stake in the ground.
- “Social CRM is a philosophy & a business strategy, supported by a technology platform, business rules, workflow, processes & social characteristics, designed to engage the customer in a collaborative conversation to give mutually beneficial value in a trusted & transparent business environment. It’s the company’s response to the customer’s joint ownership of the conversation”
- Enterprise 2.0. For this work I will use Andrew McAfee’s definition from May of 2006.
- “Enterprise 2.0 is the use of emergent social software platforms within companies, or between companies and their partners or customers.”
- Government 2.0. My chosen definition comes from the Australian Government 2.0 Google Group.
- “Government 2.0 is not specifically about social networking or technology based approaches to anything. It represents a fundamental shift in the implementation of government – toward an open, collaborative, cooperative arrangement where there is (wherever possible) open consultation, open data, shared knowledge, mutual acknowledgment of expertise, mutual respect for shared values and an understanding of how to agree to disagree. Technology and social tools are an important part of this change but are essentially an enabler in this process.”
- Social Media. The definition I will use is the one given by Brian Solis.
- “Social Media is the democratization of information, transforming people from content readers into publishers. It is the shift from a broadcast mechanism, one-to-many, to a many-to-many model, rooted in conversations between authors, people, and peers.”
That’s all for today, let me know what you think.
John












July 10, 2010 at 5:38 pm
Great start on this John. What you might take a look at as a unifying principle is Yochai Benkler’s work on “social production”. Social production is in a sense the “output” of networks, results from distributed connection and exchange – usually uncompensated – at least using traditional economic measures.
Social CRM, Enterprise 2.0, Gov 2.0 etc., are all simply methodologies to achieve or support social production. CRM supports transactional communications. Enterprise 2.0 typically supports collaborative networks. Traditional collaborative tools typically support episodic networks with limited density.
As with any complex systems, the key to understanding eco-systems is less about the mechanics, and more about behavioral understanding. My personal contribution to this understanding is development of the “Network Competency Model”™ I will be writing and speaking about NCM over the next year. It fits your paradigm very well and similarly is designed to make a complex subject more understandable, less “pop social” and more substantive.
June 25, 2010 at 5:55 pm
I love the piece John.
“I plan to create a table of contents, a section for terms, and break this down into a book-like format” I am already looking forward to it.
I love the Key Components breakdown. I will use that in my pitches here in Kenya. Again, this is pretty good stuff and I can’t wait for the book-like format.
June 25, 2010 at 1:36 pm
Nice description, John.
SInce you mention social media and Enterprise 2.0 here, you might want to expand the concept to include social business strategy, which in my world is an overarching plan encompassing all the social/web2.0 activities. A year ago we were talking about enterprise 2.0 and many companies were just thinking about it. Lately, I’ve noticed that companies are doing ‘internal’ projects (like Yammer or corporate facebook like networking) and ‘external’ (like brand management or social media). If we are looking at the big picture, like the ecosystem, there must be a big picture plan about what the company hopes to achieve and where it’s going. Thats the social business strategy. If this interests you, i’ve blogged about it here: http://bit.ly/cPVgus
June 25, 2010 at 11:44 pm
Great post Keri. I’ll refer to it down the road as we move past the high-level academic aspects that are required for setting the stage I’ll pull this in.
June 25, 2010 at 12:36 am
[...] Social Ecosystem (via John Moore’s Weblog) John Moore’s recent article (The Social Ecosystem) is of great interest to all of us at The Periscope Group. Is a concept such as a “social [...]
June 24, 2010 at 8:18 pm
Ah, yes…the inevitable “social ecosystem.” Tis true that this new media world in which we live and play is channel-neutral.
As you progress through your eBook, I’d highly suggest that you ping Kim (@kpkfusion) about his network competency vision. Would be a great addition to this piece.
(BTW, love Brian Solis’ definition of social media. Will have to use that one.)
Good stuff. Thanks for sharing.
June 24, 2010 at 8:20 pm
Thanks Courtney. I will definitely ping Kim on this as well. Appreciate the feedback.
June 24, 2010 at 5:38 pm
John, thank you for getting the conversation rolling. I very much like the “social ecosystem” concept and the 3 key components. Over the last 2 years I’ve talked to a lot of leaders in private and public sectors. To a person they have asked for clarification and some sort of threaded language to wrap their heads (and strategies and budgets) around. Last year I launched a major project built on a social platform. Trying to explain things in an unthreaded system was and continues to be very difficult. It steals cycles that need to be focused on development. A “social ecosystem” would have made a huge difference in achieving clarity of purpose, alignment of strategies and ultimately allocation of resources. I’m looking forward to the evolution of these conversations and the “social ecosystem.” I will bring several people who are building a “system of management” into this conversation as well. Ultimately, that system and this ecosystem will be closely tied together. More to follow … Aaron
June 24, 2010 at 8:59 am
I’m excited. There are so many possibilities given the connections that we are creating every day via the web, and the opportunities really do seem to be (to me anyways) endless.
Be in touch soon, John
June 24, 2010 at 12:19 pm
Thanks Michelle. Plenty more to come, look forward to your continued feedback.
June 24, 2010 at 7:52 am
Hello John,
I like the general framework of ecosystem, organization and unit. It almost feel like that you can just drop the “social” prefix, because it reflects the biological organization of human hierarchies so well.
I am not sure where you are taking this b/c it’s just all definitions for now. But so far so good.
June 24, 2010 at 12:19 pm
Thanks Michael, appreciate your feedback. I look forward to chatting soon (will reach out next week) and we can discuss this and other topics.
June 24, 2010 at 5:43 am
[...] John F. Moore takes an opening crack at characterizing “The Social Ecosystem”Team Newsom twitpics Russian President Medvedev’s first tweetAndrea DiMaio: When Public Servants Make the DifferenceAlan W. Silberberg: Monopolies, Gov 2.0 and Community [...]
June 24, 2010 at 5:43 am
[...] John F. Moore takes an opening crack at characterizing “The Social Ecosystem”Team Newsom twitpics Russian President Medvedev’s first tweetAndrea DiMaio: When Public Servants Make the DifferenceAlan W. Silberberg: Monopolies, Gov 2.0 and Community [...]
June 24, 2010 at 5:43 am
[...] John F. Moore takes an opening crack at characterizing “The Social Ecosystem”Team Newsom twitpics Russian President Medvedev’s first tweetAndrea DiMaio: When Public Servants Make the DifferenceAlan W. Silberberg: Monopolies, Gov 2.0 and Community [...]
June 23, 2010 at 10:34 pm
Great initiative, look forward to the outcomes.
Enterprise 2.0, Government 2.0 and social media are all broad and generic terms. As key definitions you are not bound yet. I do feel different about social crm as key definition. If all discussions followed about social crm, it is considered by specialist as the “connector” between at one side the chaotic social media world and the other side the structured enterprise/government 2.0. CRM is a strategy, though mostly considered a tool, to work for sales, marketing and customer service. Social media is considered just an extra channel within CRM. I think some silo thinking might be at work taking this approach. Social media impacts the behavior of a company (actually the people working at the company) as a whole; it has broad impact on all disciplines. Using Social CRM as a key definition, you might run the risk to focus to early. If you look at social media with a sales, marketing and customer service mindset you will run the risk of missing even the essence of social media. A lot of people are motivated to publish through social media because sales did the old Ben Franklin approach on them or marketing was promising things companies never delivered. Wont even talk about customer services. Call it Conversation 2.0 or whatever. Paul Greenberg’s definition is fully applicable.
June 23, 2010 at 8:33 pm
Looking forward to this series. I think the hype surrounding certain buzz words does hold back organizations from seeing how social media should and can be integrated with the rest of the enterprise.
Lauren Vargas
Sr. Community Manager at Radian6
@VargasL
June 23, 2010 at 7:01 pm
[...] The Social Ecosystem Share and Enjoy: [...]