As you may recall, in part one of defining the Social Organization we discussed a few reasons why we need a new view of the world. We also took time to define The Social Organization in very simple terms:
The Social Organization will use standard approaches that make it easy for customers/citizens to find and buy products and services while enabling the organization to meet their goals.
This easy to understand definition enables us to begin to define the attributes of the Social Organization:
- Social Organizations use standard approaches. They follow a well-defined framework for successfully achieving their goals. We will define this framework as we go, but understand that 75-80% of the framework applies across all types of organizations in The Social Ecosystem. The remaining percentage takes into account the uniqueness of your organization.
- Social Organizations focus on delivering value in an equitable way. We do not live in a utopian world, we live in a world where services are delivered in a way where, ideally, customers feel they have received value while allowing organizations to meet their goals (for businesses, making money). For example:
- When a customer buys an iPhone they are not focused on the amount of profit made by Apple, they are only concerned with the value received for their money. If they feel they received the value expected they are happy. If Apple, as the Social Organization in this example, is able to meet its goals as well, both sides have “won”, equity is achieved.
While less clear from our simple definition, these are the other key attributes of the Social Organization:
- Social Organizations are focused strategically, not tactically. Social Organizations understand the need for a goal-oriented strategy and use them to make sure that the greatest value is achieved. While grass-root efforts can help raise initial awareness of social media tools, these efforts will not meet broad organizational success unless they become part of the overall organizational strategy.
- Social Organizations understand that they are part of The Social Ecosystem and deliver value internally and externally. Value is created everywhere in the organization and this value must be delivered to the right people at the right time. This includes examples such as:
- Ensuring the right people in the organization are working with customers on sales and marketing efforts.
- Bringing the right internal (and possibly external partner) resources together to solve customer reported issues.
- Ensuring that knowledge held by one member of the organization is delivered to other members of the organization, and other organizations as well, when needed.
- Analytical. The Social Organization uses metrics to decide if they are on track to meet their goals and use this information to adjust strategies and tactics as needed.
You may have noted that I once again left out the word transparent. The Social Organization does not have to be transparent to engage with its market and to meet its goals. Even those that choose to be transparent must choose the level of transparency required, the amount of transparency that is acceptable, and balance as needed.
John












August 1, 2010 at 3:27 pm
[...] Social Organization August 1, 2010 — John Moore We have explored the attributes of The Social Organization earlier in this series and I now wanted to take a moment to give guidance for any Social [...]
July 4, 2010 at 4:55 pm
[...] John Moore’s weblog: As you may recall, in part one of defining the Social Organization we discussed a few reasons why [...]
July 1, 2010 at 1:10 pm
Hey John,
So, here’s my 2 cents.
Its been a while since I chimed in (I still read faithfully
When you talk about the social organization, I think you may have missed the most obvious attributes – social people and a social culture.
You hinted at it with the bullet point “Ensuring the right people in the organization are working with customers on sales and marketing efforts.” The ‘right people’ I think is too open for interpretation. And, focusing just on traditional customer-facing fucntions of sales and marketing is too narrow a scope. As for customer-facing functions, what about customer service (that hurts, my friend).
Anyway, beyond the right people in traditional customer facing roles, the impact of a socially empowered culture is even more powerful in driving to the objectives you outlined. So, you’ve got all these great customer-friendly people in sales and marketing (anc customer service) but the COI has locked down every URL except the company website. And the CEO thinks people Facebooking (how the hell did that become a verb. good grief!) on company time is a productivity killer. You’ve actually blogged about this technology lock down before (see I do read it all). How social is that organization?
And lets not forget that EVERY function in a social organization needs to think about the customer first. Heck, this isn’t anything new that we haven’t been preaching about the “customer-centric” organization for the past 20+ years.
So, forget standard process, to me the key attributes of a social organization are
1) creative, ‘social’ people
2) a culture that empowers those people to engage in activities that drive a greater mutual value creation for company and customer.
thanks
Barry
July 1, 2010 at 1:14 pm
My goodness. I need to proof read. I can’t type!!!
July 1, 2010 at 1:16 pm
Barry, great feedback which is very much appreciated.
I am happy to say that all of your points will be covered as we continue deeper into The Social Ecosystem. Some will be covered by discussion of Social Units (groups and individuals), others as we go into the business cases, policies, and strategies.
I agree completely that all people, all organizations, must take into account their role in the ecosystem, just did not explicity call this out in the overview. However, while not a complete list, agree that these groups should include customer service, marketing, sales, engineering, political campaigns, finance, town governments, vendor management, and on and on.
Thank you for weighing in, Barry. Your response both helps me feel better about being on the right track while pointing out that later updates to this must continue to be clearer and more complete.
If you get a chance, drop me an e-mail, would be great to catch up.
John
June 30, 2010 at 5:49 pm
John, I want to respond and will later today. This afternoon will be spent with state and county government leaders assessing their need for a system of management riding on a social framework. I wish we had the “social ecosystem” right now! More later … Aaron
June 30, 2010 at 5:05 pm
[...] Attributes of the Social Organization (Part 2) [...]